1. Code
  2. PHP

PDO vs. MySQLi: Which Should You Use?


When accessing a database in PHP, we have two choices: MySQLi and PDO. So what should you know before choosing one? The differences, database support, stability, and performance concerns will be outlined in this article.

If you work with databases in PHP often, you might want to check out the range of useful scripts and apps for both MySQLi and PDO on Envato Market.

PDO apps on Envato Market
PDO apps on Envato Market


Database support 12 different drivers MySQL only
API OOP OOP + procedural
Connection Easy Easy
Named parameters Yes No
Object mapping Yes Yes
Prepared statements
(client side)
Yes No
Performance Fast Fast
Stored procedures Yes Yes


It's a cinch to connect to a database with both of these:

Please note that these connection objects / resources will be considered to exist through the rest of this tutorial.

API Support

Both PDO and MySQLi offer an object-oriented API, but MySQLi also offers a procedural API - which makes it easier for newcomers to understand. If you are familiar with the native PHP MySQL driver, you will find migration to the procedural MySQLi interface much easier. On the other hand, once you master PDO, you can use it with any database you desire!

Database Support

The core advantage of PDO over MySQLi is in its database driver support. At the time of this writing, PDO supports 12 different drivers, opposed to MySQLi, which supports MySQL only.

To print a list of all the drivers that PDO currently supports, use the following code:

What does this mean? Well, in situations when you have to switch your project to use another database, PDO makes the process transparent. So all you'll have to do is change the connection string and a few queries - if they use any methods which aren't supported by your new database. With MySQLi, you will need to rewrite every chunk of code - queries included.

Named Parameters

This is another important feature that PDO has; binding parameters is considerably easier than using the numeric binding:

...opposed to the MySQLi way:

The question mark parameter binding might seem shorter, but it isn't nearly as flexible as named parameters, due to the fact that the developer must always keep track of the parameter order; it feels "hacky" in some circumstances.

Unfortunately, MySQLi doesn't support named parameters.

Object Mapping

Both PDO and MySQLi can map results to objects. This comes in handy if you don't want to use a custom database abstraction layer, but still want ORM-like behavior. Let's imagine that we have a User class with some properties, which match field names from a database.

Without object mapping, we would need to fill each field's value (either manually or through the constructor) before we can use the info() method correctly.

This allows us to predefine these properties before the object is even constructed! For isntance:


Both libraries provide SQL injection security, as long as the developer uses them the way they were intended (read: escaping / parameter binding with prepared statements).

Lets say a hacker is trying to inject some malicious SQL through the 'username' HTTP query parameter (GET):

If we fail to escape this, it will be included in the query "as is" - deleting all rows from the users table (both PDO and mysqli support multiple queries).

As you can see, PDO::quote() not only escapes the string, but it also quotes it. On the other side, mysqli_real_escape_string() will only escape the string; you will need to apply the quotes manually.

I recommend that you always use prepared statements with bound queries instead of PDO::quote() and mysqli_real_escape_string().


While both PDO and MySQLi are quite fast, MySQLi performs insignificantly faster in benchmarks - ~2.5% for non-prepared statements, and ~6.5% for prepared ones. Still, the native MySQL extension is even faster than both of these. So if you truly need to squeeze every last bit of performance, that is one thing you might consider.


Ultimately, PDO wins this battle with ease. With support for twelve different database drivers (eighteen different databases!) and named parameters, we can ignore the small performance loss, and get used to its API. From a security standpoint, both of them are safe as long as the developer uses them the way they are supposed to be used (read: prepared statements).

So if you're still working with MySQLi, maybe it's time for a change!